Preview

Proceedings of the Russian Geographical Society

Advanced search

Social segregation of private activity spaces in posttransformational metropolis (by the example of Saint-Petersburg)

Abstract

On the basis of surveys taken in Saint-Petersburg in 2006-2007, a decision can be made that the transformation has led to distinct division of city space between people of different social status. This concerns not so much to residential spatial segregation as to spaces of activity that consist of personal dairy, weekly, annual etc movement routes and subjects of visit. We have committed and described differences in types of personal activity spaces between different social groups and similarity of such spaces inside these groups. We studied space-time parameters of consumer behaviour, work, social contacts and recreation of different social groups' representatives. All that led us to make a number of conclusions about factors that influence on the process of private activity spaces' social segregation and spatiotemporal component of different social groups' behaviour.

About the Author

К. Аксенов

Russian Federation


References

1. Аксенов К., Брадэ И., Бондарчук Е. Трансформационное и пострансформационное городское пространство. Ленинград-Санкт-Петербург 1989-2002. СПб.: Геликон-плюс, 2006.

2. Вендина О. Мигранты в Москве: грозит ли российской столице этническая сегрегация? / Миграционная ситуация в регионах России / Ред. Ж. Зайончковская. Вып. 3. 2005.

3. Деловой Петербург. 26 февр. 2002.

4. Комсомольская правда-Санкт-Петербург. 11 апр. 1997.

5. Протасенко Т. З., Ревтова В. Г., Фадеева О. С. Изменения в уровне жизни и социальная атмосфера

6.

7. (Санкт-Петербург 1991-1999) / Телескоп. 2000. 1. C. 6-9.

8. Эксперт-Северо-Запад. 18, 14-20 мая 2007.

9. Boal F. W. Segregation in Social geography, progress, and prospect, ed. C. Peach. New York: Croom Helm,

10.

11. Beckenham, 1987.

12. Buliung R. N., Kanaroglou P. S. Urban Form and Household Activity-Travel Behavior / Growth and Change.

13.

14. Vol. 37. N 2.

15. Gladwell M. The tipping point. How little things can make a big difference. Little, Brown and Co., 2000.

16. Jackson P. Construction of place, race and nation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994.

17. Newsome T. H., Walcott W. A., Smith P. D. Urban activity spaces: Illustrations and application of a conceptual

18.

19. model for integrating the time and space dimensions / Transportation. 1998. 25.

20. Silbey D. Geographies of exclusion. London: Routledge, 1995.

21. Schnell I., Yoav B. The sociospatial isolation of agents in everyday life spaces as an aspect of segregation.

22.

23. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2001. 91 (4).

24. Schwanen T., Dieleman F. M., Dijst M. Travel behaviour in Dutch monocentric and policentric urban

25.

26. systems / Journal of Transport Geography. 2001. 9.

27. Shelling T. Dynamic model of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 1971. 1.


Review

For citations:


  Social segregation of private activity spaces in posttransformational metropolis (by the example of Saint-Petersburg). Proceedings of the Russian Geographical Society. 2009;141(1):9.

Views: 258


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-6071 (Print)