Evaluation of the Aesthetic Properties of Plain Landscape by Remote Earth Sounding Methods (Case Study of the Museum-Reserve “Kulikovo Pole”)
https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869607122050056
Abstract
The aesthetic properties of landscapes are traditionally determined on the basis of a system of visual indicators in the course of field surveys along individual routes. The possibility of using remote methods in such studies depends on the agreement of their results with field data. The article compares the results of the aesthetic assessment of the landscapes of the museum-reserve “Kulikovo pole” based on traditional field methods and high-resolution images obtained from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The study was carried out in May 2021 for the museum’s ecological trail, about 6 km long, on which observation points with panoramic views are marked, typical for the landscape of hilly-ridged structural-denudation plains. Using the example of three indicators–depth and variety of perspectives, forest coverage and abundance of open spaces in the landscape—it is demonstrated that the method of aesthetic assessment of landscapes based on the combined data of DTM (2 m resolution) and SRTM DEM (30 m resolution) allows you to determine these visual indicators with good match with field results. In some cases, it is required to use corrections because of visual distortion associated with the remoteness of the observed objects. It is shown that the method of aesthetic assessment of landscapes using GIS technologies, which was previously carried out for mountainous areas, can be used for less expressive relief and anthropogenically transformed flat landscapes.
About the Authors
N. N. Kalutskova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
E. A. Lozbeneva
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Bibaeva A.Yu., Makarov A.A. Primenenie GIS dlya rascheta kompleksnyh pokazatelej esteticheskoj ocenki landshaftov // Izv. Irkutskogo gos. un-ta. Seriya Nauki o Zemle. 2018. T. 24. S. 17–33. https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3402.2018.24.17
2. Bredihin A.V. Esteticheskaya ocenka rel’efa pri rekreacionno-geomorfologicheskih issledovaniyah // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 5: Geografiya. 2005. № 3. S. 7–13.
3. Burova O.V. Opyt kartografirovaniya transformacii istoricheskogo landshafta Kulikova Polya: metody i rezul’taty // Izv. Tul’skogo gos. un-ta. Seriya Estestvennye nauki. 2019. S. 109–118.
4. Vdovyuk L.N., Motoshina A.A. Metodicheskie priemy ocenki esteticheskih svojstv landshaftov Tyumenskoj oblasti // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gos. un-ta. 2013. № 4. S. 58–66.
5. Gorbunova T.Yu., Gorbunov R.V., Klyuchkina A.A. Ocenka pejzazhno-esteticheskoj cennosti landshaftov Yugo-Vostochnogo Kryma // Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo fed. un-ta im. V.I. Vernadskogo. Seriya: Geografiya. Geologiya. 2017. T. 3 (69). № 3. Ch. 2. S. 237–249.
6. Gorbunov R.V., Tabunshchik V.A., Gorbunova T.Yu. Nereshennye teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie voprosy pri esteticheskoj ocenke landshaftov // Geograficheskij vestnik. 2020. № 3(54). S. 6–22. https://doi.org/10.17072/2079-7877-2020-3-6-22
7. Dirin D.A. Ocenka i rekreacionnoe ispol’zovanie pejzazhno-esteticheskih resursov Ust’-Koksinskogo rajona Respubliki Altaj. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo Sib. otd. RAN, 2007. 206 s.
8. Kalashnikova O.V. Pejzazheobrazuyushchee znachenie elementov landshaftnoj struktury // Problemy geologii i geografii Sibiri: materialy nauch. konf. Vestnik Tomskogo gos. un-ta. 2003. № 3. S. 90–93.
9. Kolbovskij E.Yu., Medovikova U.A. Ocenka esteticheskih svojstv landshaftov dlya upravleniya territoriyami vydayushchejsya kul’turno-istoricheskoj i prirodnoj cennosti // Izvestiya RGO. 2016. T. 148. № 3. S. 61–75.
10. Kochurov B.I., Buchackaya N.V. Ocenka esteticheskogo potenciala landshaftov // Yug Rossii: ekologiya i razvitie. 2007. № 4. S. 25–34. https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2007-4-25-34
11. Muhina L.I. Opyt razrabotki metodiki rekreacionnoj ocenki prirodnyh kompleksov // Geograficheskie problemy organizacii otdyha i turizma. M.: 1975. Vyp. 2. S. 3–13.
12. Nazarov N.N., Postnikov D.A. Ocenka pejzazhno-esteticheskoj privlekatel’nosti landshaftov Permskoj oblasti dlya celej turizma i rekreacii // Izvestiya RGO. 2002. Vyp. 4. S. 3–18.
13. Nikolaev V.A. Landshaftovedenie: estetika i dizajn. Uchebnoe posobie // M.: Aspekt Press. 2005. 176 s.
14. Rotanova I.N., Vasil’eva O.A. Ocenka esteticheskoj privlekatel’nosti landshaftov proektiruemogo prirodnogo parka “Predgor’e Altaya” s primeneniem geoinformacionnyh tekhnologij // Nauka i turizm: strategii vzaimodejstviya. Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta. 2017. Vyp. 7(5). S. 29–36.
15. Frolova M.Yu. Ocenka esteticheskih dostoinstv prirodnyh landshaftov // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 5: Geografiya. 1994. № 24. S. 27–33.
16. Sheremet E.A., Dekhnich V.S., Kaluckova N.N. Vozmozhnosti primeneniya GIS-tekhnologij dlya ocenki vizual’nyh svojstv landshaftov pri organizacii geoparkov // Izvestiya RGO. 2020. T. 152. № 6. S. 69–78. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869607120060063
17. Sheremet E.A., Kaluckova N.N., Dekhnich V.S. Vizual’nye svojstva landshaftov i metody ih ocenki s primeneniem GIS (na primere Belogradchishskih skal (Bolgariya)) // InterKarto. InterGIS. 2021. T. 27. S. 191–204. https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2021-2-27-191-204
18. Eringis K.I., Budryunas A.-R.A. Sushchnost’ i metodika detal’nogo ekologo-esteticheskogo issledovaniya pejzazhej // Ekologiya i estetika landshafta. Vil’nyus: Mintis, 1975. S. 107–170.
19. Cwiakala P., Kocierz R., Puniach E., Nedzka M., Mamczarz K., Niewiem W., Wiacek P. Assessment of the possibility of using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for the documentation of hiking trails in Alpine areas // Inter. Journ. Sensors by MDPI. 2017. V. 18. Iss. 1. P. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010081
20. Dronin N., Kalutskova N., Dekhnich V., Sheremet E. History Of Scenery Studies in Russian Geography// 9th Conference of the European Society for the History of Science. Visual, Material and Sensory Cultures of Science, Università di Bologna, 2020. pp. 183–184.
21. Hackney C., Clayton A. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and their application in geomorphic mapping // Geomorphological Techniques. 2015. Chap. 1. Sec. 1.7. P. 1–15. ISSN 2047-0371.
22. Shaoyu L., Weijie D., Yongbo Y. Application of UAV oblique photograph modeling technology in mountain tourism planning // 3rd International Symposium on EEEMS. Francis Academic Press. 2018. P. 240–245. https://doi.org/10.25236/eeems.2018.047
23. Shiou Y., Chengju D., Zhihui C., Hao W., Kailang G., Yirong L., Yongjie C., Wenyan L., Qiang F., Wenbo L. Assessing safety and suitability of old trails for hiking using ground and drone surveys // ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020. V. 9 (4). P. 221–238. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9040221
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Kalutskova N.N., Lozbeneva E.A. Evaluation of the Aesthetic Properties of Plain Landscape by Remote Earth Sounding Methods (Case Study of the Museum-Reserve “Kulikovo Pole”). Proceedings of the Russian Geographical Society. 2022;154(5-6):47-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869607122050056
Views:
93
Email this article 