Geography on the Threshold of World of Complexity
https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869607121010067
Abstract
The issues of the development of geographical science in the historical conditions of the postmodern and post-structuralism era are discussed. It is shown how the concepts of philosophical postmodernism and poststructuralism “complexity”, “deconstruction”, “arrangement” can be used in the method and methodology of geography (mainly physical geography). Deconstruction creates new historical conditions for the functioning of the scientific method in general and the work of the geographer in particular. Complexity gives rise to such objects of research that were methodically inaccessible for the geographical science of modern times. The “arrangement” represents them as a subject of research. Examples of interpretation of well-known geographic objects from methodological and methodological positions, different from those adopted in the epochs of Enlightenment and Modernity, are given. The relevance of the philosophical and methodological search in geographical science, which seeks to explore phenomena of complexity, is shown. The concept of deconstructive geography is introduced and its relation to such areas as radical and constructive geography is considered.
About the Author
Yu. G. Tyutyunnik
Institute of Evolutionary Ecology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Ukraine
Ukraine
References
1. Arshinov V.I. Na puti k setecentrichnomu ponimaniju slozhnostnosti // Slozhnost’. Razum. Postneklassika. 2018. № 3. S. 34–55. Jelektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal: http://cmp.esrae.ru (data obrashcheniya: 25.12.20).
2. Arshinov V.I., Svirskij Ja.I. Slozhnostnyj mir i ego nabljudatel’ // Filosofija nauki i tehniki. 2015. T. 20. № 2. S. 70–84 (chast’ 1); 2016. T. 21. № 1. S. 78–91 (chast’ 2).
3. Bazhenov L.B. Analiz antiscientistskih tendencij v obshhestvennom soznanii // Budushhee fundamental’noj nauki: Konceptual’nye, filosofskie i social’nye aspekty problemy. M.: KRASAND, 2011. S. 75–87.
4. Vallerstajn I. Mirosistemnyj analiz: Vvedenie / Per. s angl. Izd. 2-e, ispr. M.: URSS LENAND, 2018. 304 s.
5. Gerasimov I.P. Jekologicheskie problemy v proshloj, nastojashhej i budushhej geografii mira. M.: Nauka, 1985. 248 s.
6. Deljoz Zh., Gvattari F. Tysjacha plato: Kapitalizm i shizofrenija / Per. s fr. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktorija; M.: Astrel’, 2010. 895 s.
7. Derrida Zh. O grammatologii / Per. s fr. M.: Ad Marginem, 2000. 512 s.
8. Deskola F. Po storonu prirody i kul’tury / Per. s fr. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2012. 584 s.
9. Isachenko A.G. Izbrannye trudy (K 90-letiju so dnja rozhdenija). SPb.: Izd-vo “VVM”, 2012. 486 s.
10. Isachenko A.G. Landshaftnaja struktura Zemli, rasselenie, prirodopol’zovanie. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. Un-ta, 2008. 320 s.
11. Kaganskij V.L. Kul’turnyj landshaft i sovetskoe obitaemoe prostranstvo: Sb. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2001. 576 s.
12. Kara-Murza M.G. Poterjannyj razum. M.: Algoritm. 2005. 704 s.
13. Kastel’s M. Informacionnaja jepoha: jekonomika, obshhestvo i kul’tura / Per. s angl. M.: GU VShJe, 2000. 608 s.
14. Kizima V.V. Totallogija (filosofija obnovlenija). K.: Izdatel’ PARAPAN, 2005.272 s.
15. Кruglov І. Тransdyscyplinarna gejekologjz. L’viv: LNU im. Ivana Franka, 2020. 292 с.
16. Latur B. Novogo vremeni ne bylo. Jesse po simmetrichnoj antropologi / Per. s fr. SPb.: Izd-vo Evropejskogo un-ta v Sankt- Peterburge, 2006. 296 s.
17. Lejtmotivy geograficheskih issledovanij: Kakovy oni i nuzhny li nam? (Materialy seminara (kruglogo stola): A.V. Drozdov, V.L. Kaganskij, E.Ju. Kolbovskij, A.I. Trejvish, V.A. Shuper) // Izv. RAN. Ser. geogr. 2017. № 3. S. 118–128.
18. Liotar Zh.-F. Sostojanie postmoderna / Per. s fr. M.: “Institut jeksperimental’noj sociologii”, SPb: “Aletejja”, 1998. 160 s.
19. Mandevil’ B. Vozroptavshi ulej, ili moshenniki, stavshie chestnymi: per s angl. // A.L. Subbotin, B. Mandevil’. M.: Mysl’, 1986. S. 117–130.
20. Rabinovich V.L. Alhimija kak fenomen kul’tury // Priroda. 1973. № 9. S. 86–97.
21. Svirskij Ja.I. Na puti k “slozhnostnomu” myshleniju: Posleslovie // Zh. Deljoz, F. Gvattari. Tysjacha plato: Kapitalizm i shizofrenija / Per. s fr. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktorija; M.: Astrel’, 2010. S. 872–889.
22. Solncev V.N. Sistemnaja organizacija landshaftov: (Problemy metodologii i teorii). M.: Mysl’, 1981. 239 s.
23. Tyutyunnik Yu.G. Landshaft i landshaftnost’. K.: Institut jevoljucionnoj jekologii NAN Ukrainy, 2019. 124 s.
24. Tyutyunnik Yu.G. O landshaftnoj prirode sub’ektivnosti // Voprosy filosofii. 2020. № 3. S. 194–203.
25. Fejerabend P. Izbrannye trudy po metodologii nauki / Per. s angl. i nem. M.: Progress, 1986. 542 s.
26. Hajdegger M. Evropejskij nigilizm // Problema cheloveka v zapadnoj filosofii: perevody. M.: Progress, 1988. S. 261–313.
27. Horkhajmer M., Adorno T. Dialektika Prosveshhenija. Filosofskie fragmenty / Per. s nem. M.–SPb: “Medium”, “Juventa”, 1997. 312 s.
28. Cherkashin A.K., Istomina E.A., Vladimirov I.N., Mjadzelec A.V., Mjasnikova S.I., Solodjankina S.V., Trofimova I.E., Frolov A.A. Gomologija i gomotopija geograficheskih sistem. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo “Geo”, 2009. 351 s.
29. Choran Je.-M. Vypast’ iz vremeni // Apokalipsis smysla: Sbornik rabot zapadnyh filosofov XX– XXI vv.: perevody. M.: Algoritm, 2007. S. 123–132.
30. Jetkind A. Priroda zla. Syr’jo i gosudarstvo. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2020. 504 s.
31. Hodder I. The Domestication of Europe: Structure and Contingency in Neolithic Societies (Social Archaeology). Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell, 1990. 330 р.
Review
For citations:
Tyutyunnik Yu.G. Geography on the Threshold of World of Complexity. Proceedings of the Russian Geographical Society. 2021;153(1):69-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869607121010067
Views:
101
Email this article 