Preview

Proceedings of the Russian Geographical Society

Advanced search

Difficulties of doing business in the Arctic and Northern regions of Russia

https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869607122020069

Abstract

The northern and arctic regions generate about a quarter of Russia’s GDP at the expense of large commodity corporations, while the territory is characterized by unfavorable natural conditions. For many years, the question of the prospects for the development and diversification of the economy of these regions through new non-primary businesses has been discussed. The purpose of the study is to identify the features and opportunities for the development of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the northern and Arctic regions of Russia using cartographic and econometric methods. The article shows that the costs for small businesses in the Arctic and the North are indeed higher, but not only because of natural conditions, but also because of institutional features: “northern allowances” and a less favorable business climate. This leads to a truncated development of entrepreneurial networks, low density and insufficient diversity of small business, weak interaction, its greater dependence on large companies and the state. Such entrepreneurial ecosystems are more vulnerable to crises, and their recovery, on the contrary, is delayed. However, in monopolized local markets with high consumer demand, the productivity and profitability of existing (surviving) enterprises may be higher than the Russian average; especially the rate of return is high in large corporations. In conclusion, some public support measures and prospects for the development of northern entrepreneurship are described.

About the Authors

S. P. Zemtsov
Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Moscow



V. L. Baburin
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Moscow



Yu. V. Tsareva
Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Moscow



References

1. Baburin V.L. Sovokupnye izderzhki kak bazovaya kategoriya ocenki xozyajstvennoj deyatel’nosti v Arktike // Izvestiya RAN. Seriya geograficheskaya. 2018. №. 3. S. 18–25. https://doi.org/10.7868/S2587556618030032

2. Baburin V.L., Badina S.V., Goryachko M.D., Zemczov S.P. Zony koncentracii social’no-ekonomicheskogo potenciala Arktiki // Menyayushhijsya klimat i social’no-ekonomicheskij potencial rossijskoj Arktiki. M., 2015. S. 74–128.

3. Baranov A.Yu., Malkov E.S., Polishhuk L.I., Roxlicz M., Syunyaev G.R. Izmerenie institutov v rossijskix regionax: metodologiya, istochniki dannyh, analiz // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2015 (2). S. 69–103. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-2-69-103.

4. Barinova V.A., Zemczov S.P., Czareva Yu.V. Predprinimatel’stvo i instituty: est’ li svyaz’ na regional’nom urovne v Rossii // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2018. № 6. S. 92–116. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-6-92-116.

5. Barinova V., Zemczov S., Koczyubinskij V., Krasnosel’skih A., Czareva Yu. Vypolnenie strategii razvitiya malogo i srednego predprinimatel`stva v Rossii // Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii. 2018. T. 25. № 11. S. 36–45.

6. Guriev S., Sonin K. Ekonomika resursnogo proklyatiya // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2008. №. 4. S. 61–74.

7. Zamyatina N.Yu., Goncharov R.V. Arkticheskaya urbanizaciya: fenomen i sravnitel’nyj analiz // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya. 2020. №. 4. S. 69–82.

8. Zemczov S.P. Institut’, predprinimatel’stvo i regional’noe razvitie v Rossii // Zhurnal Novoj ekonomicheskoj associacii. 2020. T. 46. №. 2. S. 168–180. https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2020-46-2-9

9. Mixajlova T.N. Geografiya ne sud’ba! (kommentarii k “Sibirskomu proklyatiyu” F. Xill i K. Geddi) // Journal of Institutional Studies (Zhurnal institucional’nyh issledovanij). 2011. T. 3. № 1. S. 93–102.

10. Pilyasov A.N., Zamyatina N.Yu. Arkticheskoe predprinimatel’stvo: usloviya i vozmozhnosti razvitiya // Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. 2016. T. 4. S. 4–15.

11. Pilyasov A.N. Predprinimatel’stvo v Arktike: Problemy razvitiya malogo i srednego biznesa v Arkticheskoj zone, ili chem arkticheskie predprinimateli poxozhi na belyh medvedej? M.: URSS, 2021. 400 s.

12. Rossijskaya ekonomika v 2019 godu. Tendencii i perspektivy (Vyp. 41). M.: Izd-vo In-ta Gajdara, 2020. 632 s.

13. Rossijskaya ekonomika v 2020 godu. Tendencii i perspektivy (Vyp. 42). M.: Izd-vo In-ta Gajdara, 2021. 712 s.

14. Hill F., Gaddy C.G. The Siberian curse: How communist planners left Russia out in the cold. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2003. 302 p.

15. Fritsch M., Wyrwich M. Regional knowledge, entrepreneurial culture, and innovative start-ups over time and space – an empirical investigation // Small Business Economics. 2018. 51(2). S. 337–353.

16. Pilyasov A.N. Arctic entrepreneurship development factors // Geography, Environment, Sustainability. 2020. 13(1). S. 46–56.

17. Shane S. Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy// Small business economics. 2009. 33(2). Pp. 141–149.

18. Zemtsov S., Chepurenko A., Mikhailov A. Pandemic Challenges for the Technological Startups in the Russian Regions// Foresight and STI Governance. 2021. 15(4). S. 61–77. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2021.4.61.77


Review

For citations:


Zemtsov S.P., Baburin V.L., Tsareva Yu.V. Difficulties of doing business in the Arctic and Northern regions of Russia. Proceedings of the Russian Geographical Society. 2022;154(2):37-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869607122020069

Views: 111


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-6071 (Print)